Rules for Blogging

Be sure to check out our Rules for Blogging

Read this Blog on Your Kindle!

your kindle user name:
(*protected email*, without @kindle.com)
Approved E-mail:
(Approved E-mail that kindle will accept)
Kindle base email kindle.com | free.kindle.com
(Use kindle.com to download on wispernet or wifi, use free.kindle.com for wifi only.)
using kindle.com may incur charges)

Spring Is Here and We Reaffirm Our New Year’s Resolutions – Safety Compliance Style

Now is as good a time as any to start a new commitment towards product safety.  Making your products safe and compliant is not only an ethical business practice, it is a great way to avoid dealing with regulatory bodies and all the fines and costs associated with them.    In that spirit, we reached out to you and asked what kind of failings were the most common in 2011. Thanks to everyone who took part in our survey. We put these mistakes into three different categories: management, engineering/knowledge, and financial.  These mistakes can definitely be driven by more than one.  Make sure you don’t make these mistakes in 2012.

Top Eighteen Mistakes Not to Make in 2012

These first ones  are the result of bad engineering practices or from a lack of knowledge.

  1. Relaying grounding/earthing/bonding.  (Is relaying used throughout the inputs? – “daisy chaining” – in brackets after relaying perhaps?)
  2. Creepage/Clearance/Distance through insulation inadequate; and/or failure of dielectric test.
  3. Implementing Insulation strategy between circuits.
  4. Enclosure openings.
  5. Critical Components unsuitable for intended application/country/region/”Conditions of Use.”
  6. Over-temperature/overcurrent protection for internal/external circuits/interfaces.
  7. Flammability requirement thickness/Live parts
  8. Temperature limits of insulation/plastics/Critical Components
  9. Not fulfilling the Marking requirements. ( i.e. the Directive, and/or the standard)
  10. Warnings and Symbols – product/manual/maintenance instructions
  11. Not performing a Risk Assessment
  12. Not designing equipment so that maintenance can be accomplished safely

We felt like the next four were probably more a result of bad management practices or attempts to cut costs where costs should not be cut.

  1. Lack of Audits
  2. Out of date or no safety standards in design. (It is unreasonable to expect an engineer to remember more than 200 detailed requirements – each engineer should have a copy of the standard to which they are designing.)
  3. Failure to recognize when they need expert advice
  4. Using generalist consultants and not experts in specific disciplines.  (Example: using a specialist EMC consultant for EMC design or an expert Product Safety Engineer for Product Safety design; ditto OSHA, REACH, environmental professionals, etc.)

These last two might be Engineering, Knowledge, Management or Financial Problems.  Tell us what you think.

  1. Safety issues associated with installation, commissioning, maintenance, repair, decommissioning.
  2. Relying on equipment installers to correct any design errors

That’s our list.  If you have anything to add, put them in the comments.  We want to thank everyone who gave us insight into this list.  Happy 2012!

Leave a Reply

  

  

  


*

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

FREE bonus!

Get your copy of our Free Bonus

"EU Product Matrix"

A must-have reference that will save you time and see at a glance what directives to review against your product.!

Get Yours Today!